Skip to content

Tag: APComms

UK Now On Final Notice Over Phorm

Phorm and the UK “government” might just come to realise that the backlash against internet snooping and illegal DPI based advertising is a serious one.

The EU has announced that it is moving to the second phase of its proceedings against the UK government over its failure to enforce laws protecting internet users’ privacy.

Nazi war criminals are still prosecuted for their crimes from years ago. Other criminals are prosecuted for their crimes in previous years. Why shouldn’t those involved in allowing these crimes to happen face judicial process?

Those involved in the collaboration with BT and Phorm, whoever they are, whatever their status and regardless of for whom they were working must face the courts.

Continue reading UK Now On Final Notice Over Phorm

Dominic Grieve: A Good Start But Misses ICO Unfitness For Purpose

Shadow Secretary of State for Justice Dominic Grieve QC MP has announced a list of proposals a future Conservative government would put into place to “reverse the rise of the Surveillance State”.

Sounds good but what are the facts behind the soundbites?  More importantly what are the omissions behind the soundbites?  What isn’t said is as important as what is.  Specifically with reference to the Information Commissioner’s Office, a body which Mr Grieve wants to give more powers to.

Those who have followed the Phorm story will no doubt be aware that the ICO is complicit in allowing Phorm and BT to get away with their secret and illegal tests as any other government department.  Perhaps even more so because it is not unreasonable to expect those charged with the guardianship of Data Protection legislation to have a decent understanding of such legislation.

Mr Grieve has failed to understand the Information Commissioner’s Office complicity.  Perhaps he doesn’t know about it.

Continue reading Dominic Grieve: A Good Start But Misses ICO Unfitness For Purpose

My Challenge To Phorm Repeated

More grandiose claims from Phorm, this time from Phorm’s financial, strategic and policy development officer, Sarah Simon.

Has Ms Simon seen the videos of the 2008 town hall meeting? You know, the one of which “official” footage has never emerged. Was that because the footage shown there was unedited and thus threw a spanner into any ideas of providing an “edited” version?

Is Ms Simon aware of the legal arguments about Phorm’s technology which have resulted in the campaigns we now see and the EU taking legal action against the UK “government”? Has Ms Simon seen a qualified legal opinion saying that WebWise is compliant with all UK and EU law?

If she has then she must be a very very very privileged person indeed. I have openly challenged Kent Ertugrul, Phorm and pro-Phormers to produce a verifiable legal opinion for over a year now. Phorm’s PR people know my contact details yet I have never received any such communication from them.

Continue reading My Challenge To Phorm Repeated