<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your Online Identity Is Not As Anonymous As You Think!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=512" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=512</link>
	<description>Clear Thinking In A World Lacking Clue</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:25:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=512&#038;cpage=1#comment-217</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=512#comment-217</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s because the hardcore child porn rings are run on secure, encrypted networks, as Cory Doctorow explains &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/07/how-the-great-firewa.html#comment-349578&quot; target=&quot;_new&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.  Anything that is encrypted (which goes through websites starting https://) isn&#039;t easily broken unless you&#039;re law enforcement and have a shedload of hardware to do just that.  I&#039;d expect that terrorist groups would use similar technology.

The fact that hardcore child porn rings are run on secure, encrypted networks isn&#039;t something this &quot;government&quot; wants the general public to know, simply because it exposes their &quot;we must protect the children&quot; justification for things they do as a scam.  The more that people know child porn networks are often encrypted the more they will start asking &quot;Why are you looking to snoop on everyone?&quot;.

Use of Deep Packet Inspection technology will enable the &quot;government&quot; to snoop on every internet connection in the UK and, contrary to the claims of others and as this paper now proves,  use it to identify names and addresses.  And just as the Left like to slur those who disagree with some of their initiatives as &quot;racist&quot;, so the slur &quot;paedophile&quot; will become more prevalent as people start holding this &quot;government&quot; to account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s because the hardcore child porn rings are run on secure, encrypted networks, as Cory Doctorow explains <a href="http://www.boingboing.net/2008/12/07/how-the-great-firewa.html#comment-349578" target="_new" rel="nofollow">here</a>.  Anything that is encrypted (which goes through websites starting <a href="https://)" rel="nofollow">https://)</a> isn&#8217;t easily broken unless you&#8217;re law enforcement and have a shedload of hardware to do just that.  I&#8217;d expect that terrorist groups would use similar technology.</p>
<p>The fact that hardcore child porn rings are run on secure, encrypted networks isn&#8217;t something this &#8220;government&#8221; wants the general public to know, simply because it exposes their &#8220;we must protect the children&#8221; justification for things they do as a scam.  The more that people know child porn networks are often encrypted the more they will start asking &#8220;Why are you looking to snoop on everyone?&#8221;.</p>
<p>Use of Deep Packet Inspection technology will enable the &#8220;government&#8221; to snoop on every internet connection in the UK and, contrary to the claims of others and as this paper now proves,  use it to identify names and addresses.  And just as the Left like to slur those who disagree with some of their initiatives as &#8220;racist&#8221;, so the slur &#8220;paedophile&#8221; will become more prevalent as people start holding this &#8220;government&#8221; to account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sue</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=512&#038;cpage=1#comment-216</link>
		<dc:creator>Sue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=512#comment-216</guid>
		<description>If this is true then why don&#039;t they just catch people like paedophiles and terrorists and bring their sites down instead of penalising the rest of us for them breaking the law?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If this is true then why don&#8217;t they just catch people like paedophiles and terrorists and bring their sites down instead of penalising the rest of us for them breaking the law?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
