<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for View From Planet Jamie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog</link>
	<description>Clue - Don&#039;t Lack It, Have It!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:29:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Final Chapter Of Andrew Crossley? Suspended For 2 Years by jarco</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1556&#038;cpage=1#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator>jarco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 10:29:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1556#comment-346</guid>
		<description>I hope this guy stays broke and poor for life. Let him see how hard it is for &quot;regular people&quot; to pay these amounts for music and video.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this guy stays broke and poor for life. Let him see how hard it is for &#8220;regular people&#8221; to pay these amounts for music and video.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Southeastern Response: Placatory Garbage? by Katerina</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1481&#038;cpage=1#comment-345</link>
		<dc:creator>Katerina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 12:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1481#comment-345</guid>
		<description>God, they really are idiots aren&#039;t they, it&#039;s ridiculous. The aim of their business is to provide a service to the general public, so why are customers treated as an unwelcome side effect? Without us, they would have nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God, they really are idiots aren&#8217;t they, it&#8217;s ridiculous. The aim of their business is to provide a service to the general public, so why are customers treated as an unwelcome side effect? Without us, they would have nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Southeastern Response: Placatory Garbage? by Jamie</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1481&#038;cpage=1#comment-344</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Dec 2010 01:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1481#comment-344</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comment and adding to the picture here.  Southeastern have made no mention of the snow patrol trains in any of the correspondence I&#039;ve seen regarding their snow and service failure.  If they don&#039;t mention this fact then they can blame Network Rail and only people who know the truth know differently.

I was thinking exactly what you said in your last paragraph when I looked at LondonMidland - I&#039;m from the West Midlands and LondonMidland were a welcome replacement for Central Trains in my view.  It bemuses me that LondonMidland get things right and Southeastern don&#039;t yet both are Govia companies.  Not even the arrogant Central Trains were as bad as Southeastern.

Nothing I have read from Southeastern over the last few days has done anything to change my opinions on their fitness to run the franchise.  It is time for them to be stripped.  No ceremony, no messing about, just a simple and brutal stripping of the franchise from them.  Southeastern knew what they were getting involved with when they took the franchise on.  They have failed and must now be relieved of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment and adding to the picture here.  Southeastern have made no mention of the snow patrol trains in any of the correspondence I&#8217;ve seen regarding their snow and service failure.  If they don&#8217;t mention this fact then they can blame Network Rail and only people who know the truth know differently.</p>
<p>I was thinking exactly what you said in your last paragraph when I looked at LondonMidland &#8211; I&#8217;m from the West Midlands and LondonMidland were a welcome replacement for Central Trains in my view.  It bemuses me that LondonMidland get things right and Southeastern don&#8217;t yet both are Govia companies.  Not even the arrogant Central Trains were as bad as Southeastern.</p>
<p>Nothing I have read from Southeastern over the last few days has done anything to change my opinions on their fitness to run the franchise.  It is time for them to be stripped.  No ceremony, no messing about, just a simple and brutal stripping of the franchise from them.  Southeastern knew what they were getting involved with when they took the franchise on.  They have failed and must now be relieved of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Southeastern Response: Placatory Garbage? by BCCletts</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1481&#038;cpage=1#comment-343</link>
		<dc:creator>BCCletts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Dec 2010 22:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1481#comment-343</guid>
		<description>It is notable that from the onset of the bad weather Southwest Trains switched their website over to provide very well presented details of the stations and lines that they would not be serving and the core services that they planned to provide.  In doing this they covered the likely shortages of staff and working trains, and provided a contingency reserve of crew and trains to run when incoming services ran late.

Measures such as running the longest trains possible give more collector shoes to clear the third rail and more units to connect - so if the front unit runs on to ice the rear one(s) can pull (or push it clear.

True your modern fleet does not like drawing great arc&#039;s when there is ice or snow on the rail and the old crude trains that SWT and Southern have can batter through in conditions that some modern equipment is too fragile to work with.

A further failing that runs back to BR sectorisation days - penny pinching specs - and DfT meddling with same is that there are a variety of train coupling systems which are incompatible - when in the past almost any train could pull or push any other train.  The Southern Region even had the facility to control a diesel loco (any &#039;blue square&#039; type) connected on to an electric train (most of the old slam-door corridor stock), and the whole unit driven as a diesel train when there was no electricity.  As a key provision - which will resolve a number of issues of short trains (diesel) and bus replacement services when the power is switched off, a fleet of Thunderbird/conversion locos should be converted from suitable locos currently in storage. The &#039;conversion use would allow the Oxted-Uckfield and Hastings-Ashford services to operate with electric units which then can run the rest of the route integrated with other electric units, and could also extend the Reigate and Guildford services through to Reading.  

Third rail systems can be kept working in snow of there are regular snow patrol trains running - Network Rail don&#039;t have these trains - Southeastern does, and the drivers can be &#039;found&#039; by reducing the daytime call on drivers and trains (as the cost cutting of most rail operators has pared away all spare contingency in this respect) 

Rather surprisingly one of the best Twitter feeds was from LondonMidland a third Govia company running trains in to London.  So how come they got it so right when Southern and Southeastern left a vacuum to be filled by @_southeastern and @Southern_Trains?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is notable that from the onset of the bad weather Southwest Trains switched their website over to provide very well presented details of the stations and lines that they would not be serving and the core services that they planned to provide.  In doing this they covered the likely shortages of staff and working trains, and provided a contingency reserve of crew and trains to run when incoming services ran late.</p>
<p>Measures such as running the longest trains possible give more collector shoes to clear the third rail and more units to connect &#8211; so if the front unit runs on to ice the rear one(s) can pull (or push it clear.</p>
<p>True your modern fleet does not like drawing great arc&#8217;s when there is ice or snow on the rail and the old crude trains that SWT and Southern have can batter through in conditions that some modern equipment is too fragile to work with.</p>
<p>A further failing that runs back to BR sectorisation days &#8211; penny pinching specs &#8211; and DfT meddling with same is that there are a variety of train coupling systems which are incompatible &#8211; when in the past almost any train could pull or push any other train.  The Southern Region even had the facility to control a diesel loco (any &#8216;blue square&#8217; type) connected on to an electric train (most of the old slam-door corridor stock), and the whole unit driven as a diesel train when there was no electricity.  As a key provision &#8211; which will resolve a number of issues of short trains (diesel) and bus replacement services when the power is switched off, a fleet of Thunderbird/conversion locos should be converted from suitable locos currently in storage. The &#8216;conversion use would allow the Oxted-Uckfield and Hastings-Ashford services to operate with electric units which then can run the rest of the route integrated with other electric units, and could also extend the Reigate and Guildford services through to Reading.  </p>
<p>Third rail systems can be kept working in snow of there are regular snow patrol trains running &#8211; Network Rail don&#8217;t have these trains &#8211; Southeastern does, and the drivers can be &#8216;found&#8217; by reducing the daytime call on drivers and trains (as the cost cutting of most rail operators has pared away all spare contingency in this respect) </p>
<p>Rather surprisingly one of the best Twitter feeds was from LondonMidland a third Govia company running trains in to London.  So how come they got it so right when Southern and Southeastern left a vacuum to be filled by @_southeastern and @Southern_Trains?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Crazy Domains Slapped Down by softmutt</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1365&#038;cpage=1#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>softmutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 21:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1365#comment-339</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not easily shocked but...Revolting advert...Staggered it ever got aired! What a twat the MD was for appealing!
Interesting blog hun. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not easily shocked but&#8230;Revolting advert&#8230;Staggered it ever got aired! What a twat the MD was for appealing!<br />
Interesting blog hun. <img src='http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Labour, Phorm &amp; RIPA: Facts &amp; Questions by Pete</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1345&#038;cpage=1#comment-338</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 22:30:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1345#comment-338</guid>
		<description>Whatever way you choose to look at what happened in 2006, 2007, and 2008... it is not good for Labour.

Either, 

British Police and Security Services comprehensively failed to detect Kent Ertugrul&#039;s Russian developed spyware operating at the centre of BT&#039;s network in 2006 and 2007... during a period of critical/severe security alert and even warfare.

Or

Someone in the Cabinet authorised illegal trials of mass communication surveillance/industrial espionage to occur.

In 2008 there was a huge outcry when BT&#039;s deception was exposed. Petitions to the Prime Minister, humiliation for BT&#039;s Emma Sanderson on TV, press stories, and interventions by the European Commission.

Despite all of that, BT even continued to execute a third trial.

No one was arrested. No one has been prosecuted. Police, ICO, Ofcom, Home Office, BERR (now BIS), Trading Standards, MPs refused to act. ICO pleaded ignorance and claimed they had received assurances. Ofcom were trying to improve public perceptions of spyware. Police called it a &#039;civil matter&#039;. And the Home Office were even exposed colluding in secret with these bandits.

For three years, Phorm have ignored even the basic filing requirements for all businesses trading in the UK. But Companies House also sat on their hands.

Despite a request for prosecution, the CPS have done nothing... for approaching two years.

The extent of the corruption surrounding Phorm - both commercial and political - is just staggering. Absolutely beyond belief.

Whatever your views on democracy and politics, for pity&#039;s sake, at this election... 

PLEASE DO NOT VOTE FOR LABOUR.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever way you choose to look at what happened in 2006, 2007, and 2008&#8230; it is not good for Labour.</p>
<p>Either, </p>
<p>British Police and Security Services comprehensively failed to detect Kent Ertugrul&#8217;s Russian developed spyware operating at the centre of BT&#8217;s network in 2006 and 2007&#8230; during a period of critical/severe security alert and even warfare.</p>
<p>Or</p>
<p>Someone in the Cabinet authorised illegal trials of mass communication surveillance/industrial espionage to occur.</p>
<p>In 2008 there was a huge outcry when BT&#8217;s deception was exposed. Petitions to the Prime Minister, humiliation for BT&#8217;s Emma Sanderson on TV, press stories, and interventions by the European Commission.</p>
<p>Despite all of that, BT even continued to execute a third trial.</p>
<p>No one was arrested. No one has been prosecuted. Police, ICO, Ofcom, Home Office, BERR (now BIS), Trading Standards, MPs refused to act. ICO pleaded ignorance and claimed they had received assurances. Ofcom were trying to improve public perceptions of spyware. Police called it a &#8216;civil matter&#8217;. And the Home Office were even exposed colluding in secret with these bandits.</p>
<p>For three years, Phorm have ignored even the basic filing requirements for all businesses trading in the UK. But Companies House also sat on their hands.</p>
<p>Despite a request for prosecution, the CPS have done nothing&#8230; for approaching two years.</p>
<p>The extent of the corruption surrounding Phorm &#8211; both commercial and political &#8211; is just staggering. Absolutely beyond belief.</p>
<p>Whatever your views on democracy and politics, for pity&#8217;s sake, at this election&#8230; </p>
<p>PLEASE DO NOT VOTE FOR LABOUR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Headbangers&#8217; Neck &amp; The BMJ Lacking Clue by Jamie</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1327&#038;cpage=1#comment-330</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1327#comment-330</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

Thanks for dropping by.  Part of me was wondering if it was a spoof article.  The potential damage caused by overzealous headbanging is something I&#039;ve seen and experienced myself so it is a valid concern.  Phoning the cricket team captain that you can&#039;t play because you&#039;ve got headbangers&#039; neck doesn&#039;t endear you to the club management.  But you can&#039;t bat when you&#039;ve given it plenty on the dancefloor the night before.

AC/DC playing Moon River does take some serious imagining though...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>Thanks for dropping by.  Part of me was wondering if it was a spoof article.  The potential damage caused by overzealous headbanging is something I&#8217;ve seen and experienced myself so it is a valid concern.  Phoning the cricket team captain that you can&#8217;t play because you&#8217;ve got headbangers&#8217; neck doesn&#8217;t endear you to the club management.  But you can&#8217;t bat when you&#8217;ve given it plenty on the dancefloor the night before.</p>
<p>AC/DC playing Moon River does take some serious imagining though&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Headbangers&#8217; Neck &amp; The BMJ Lacking Clue by Scott</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1327&#038;cpage=1#comment-329</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Apr 2010 22:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1327#comment-329</guid>
		<description>Christmas issues of the BMJ usually include a few spoof / funny articles. I suspect this is one. Always question what you read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Christmas issues of the BMJ usually include a few spoof / funny articles. I suspect this is one. Always question what you read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Headbangers&#8217; Neck &amp; The BMJ Lacking Clue by softmutt</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1327&#038;cpage=1#comment-328</link>
		<dc:creator>softmutt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Apr 2010 09:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1327#comment-328</guid>
		<description>Bleedin&#039; hell......Is nothing safe anymore. I shall wrap myself up &amp; never listen to ANY music again....Just in case I get carried away! ;o)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bleedin&#8217; hell&#8230;&#8230;Is nothing safe anymore. I shall wrap myself up &amp; never listen to ANY music again&#8230;.Just in case I get carried away! ;o)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Do You Stand For? The #DEBill List Of Shame by Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1302&#038;cpage=1#comment-327</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 19:03:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.planetjamie.co.uk/blog/?p=1302#comment-327</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this list! I was searching to see how my MP voted - because if he had foted for the bill then I would have voted against him on polling day. Unfortunately he abstained... oh well, better than nothing.

Please spread the word on Facebook, Twitter etc. Show the citizens this list - with a message that if their MP voted for the bill, then they should be kicked out at the election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this list! I was searching to see how my MP voted &#8211; because if he had foted for the bill then I would have voted against him on polling day. Unfortunately he abstained&#8230; oh well, better than nothing.</p>
<p>Please spread the word on Facebook, Twitter etc. Show the citizens this list &#8211; with a message that if their MP voted for the bill, then they should be kicked out at the election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

